Thursday, January 22, 2009

Kreativ Blogger Award

Thanks to Writtenwyrrd at A Speculative Fiction Zone for giving me this award. I am very honored considering that I have been called away so frequently by work and life's other slings and arrows, but I am grateful to Written, who has a great blog full of wit, wisdom, and insightful thoughts on writing. Like Written, I too am unable to pull up the award's badge from the original website, and only the Blogger gods know why I can't access it or the other award, Proximidade, from RealmCovet.

My six sorces of inspiration are

Reading
Meditation and prayer
Music
Phrases that roll off the tongue like music
More music
Wonderful bloggers who remind me of the impirtance of language



Read more!

Proximidade Award

Thanks to Realm for her very kind words that accompany this award. Her blog The Realm of Covetedness is most entertaining and well written. I cannot access the badge the goes with this award--it is not showing up in my pic files--but it is called Proximidade, an award for "proximity and friendship" in blogging. Realm, you're one of the good souls on this planet, and I am glad our paths have crossed!


Read more!

Friday, January 16, 2009

Premio Dardos


Thanks to Shauna at Shauna Roberts' For Love of Words for passing on this award to me. Her blog is A-list all the way, and I am honored!






Read more!

Tuesday, January 6, 2009

Been on Holiday

A belated Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all. Been rather busy, but you may see a bit of flash fiction I did recently on my sister blog. The piece is called The Christmas Tree Lot.



And here is the rest of it.


Read more!

Sunday, November 30, 2008

Ten Tips for Getting Noticed in the Slush Pile

There are many articles and books about how to submit manuscripts and stand out in the slush pile. The conventional wisdom from agents themselves is write well and follow guidelines. Not a bad place to begin, but it’s simplistic to think that this is the magic doorway, even though this may sound like heresy. (To see the rest of this post, click “Read More” below.)



Submitting work is a frustrating experience, and if you’re counting on agents to conform to their own advice or protocols, you need to read my earlier posts, The Agents We Love to Hate, Part 1 and The Agents We Love to Hate, Part 2. Agents are good people, but many can’t even return manuscripts when they are accompanied by an SASE. As I said before, entire manuscripts go missing, so when Miss Snark says in a blog entry that There is no secret to getting noticed in the slush pile—poor results stem only from bad writing and not following submission guidelines—I must politely tell this grand high guru to start submitting material to her colleagues under an assumed name and see what she gets back.

Jeff Herman has had many fine articles on how to gain a competitive advantage in the slush, and I myself learned a few tricks that tipped the odds in my favor. Some are new, while others are "oldies" I have tweaked a bit. Here goes.

1) Okay, I concede that you must have a well-written story and follow the rules, at least in most cases. More on rules later.

2) If you use a brown manila envelope for your manuscript, you will, like a chameleon, blend in nicely with the other ten thousand queries. Try using a white 10” x 12” mailer or some other color. It draws the eye to your submission.

3) Make distinctive letterhead on crème-colored or light gray stationary. Once again, good presentation stands out against the 95% who use white paper and poor headings.

4) Today’s market unfortunately does not allow a story to develop in the early chapters. As agent Noah Lukeman says in his book The First Five Pages, make the opening pages count or else you’re wasting your postage. You’ve got about two to five minutes to get an agent’s attention.

5) It’s true—don’t write a cover letter longer than one page. Writing the novel is far easier, and adhering to this is like root canal work, but you’ve got to find a way to keep your hook brief and snappy. Therefore be creative with your spacing and margins. You can fit more than you think on a single page. Reduce the space between "Sincerely" and your signature. Start the letter a wee bit closer to the top, where your letterhead info is. Don't worry if the "Encl" is a bit closer to the bottom. Play with this a bit, but if it looks neat ...

6) Gimmicks are frowned upon, but I found one that really worked well. I put my bio on a separate page and typed it up in the format of an entry from Writer’s Digest. It not only stuck out, but it essentially said, “I’m a professional, too, and I’m willing to stand toe to toe with you.” I did the whole enchilada: name (in large bold letters where the entry begins), recent sales, how to contact, terms, contracts (“yes, I’ll review one”), tips, multiple submission policy, etc. All from my point of view.

7) Get stamps made at Office Depot. Don’t provide extra incentive for your manuscript to get thrown away by the powers that be. Always stamp your mailings in blue or red with QUERY or SASE ENCLOSED or REQUESTED MATERIAL ENCLOSED. It makes the mailing looks professional, plus it’s a subliminal message to the agents or their assistants that you don’t take kindly to being accused at a later date that “YOU DIDN’T FOLLOW THE SUBMISSION GUIDELINES, YOU AWFUL PERSON!”

8) Find a junior agent from the agencies website, someone who gives a little bio and who may be building a client list. State in your cover letter why you selected that person. People love to be noticed, and if you overtly say that you did your homework, you score big points. As we all know, they get tired of receiving submissions for work they don't handle.

9) Nest to “Encl” at the very bottom of the query, I put three lines of text: SASE; sample chapter; hope aplenty. That you are enclosing hope with the manuscript is a legitimate, unobtrusive way to sneak in a little humor and let the agent know that you are friendly and real. Find some kind of phrase, therefore, that might humanize you a bit more and stick it next to "Encl."

10) Under limited circumstances, break the rules. I know of a writer who typed his sample chapters single-spaced and wrote that he was poor and had to save paper. (It was true, not a gimmick.) The book became a huge bestseller. Even Jeff Herman notes that there are times to use your instincts to deviate a bit. Do so when you feel touched by the Spirit of God.

BONUS TIP: Email responses are answered far more quickly, and usually by the agent rather than an assistant, but you often forego the opportunity to submit a sample chapter since attachments are rarely allowed for obvious reasons. Weigh your options on this one.



Digg!


Read more!

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

The Economy's Impact on Publishing: Earth's Near-death Experience

It was bound to happen. The economy is hitting everyone’s pocketbook (discounting those who W. protected over the past eight years), and the book industry is not immune to the ripple effect now spreading across the country. (To see the rest of this post, click “Read More” below.)



Yesterday, Random House announced that it was freezing employee benefits. Third quarter earnings for both Barnes and Noble and Borders were down significantly. A Publishers Weekly Alert claimed that Houghton Mifflin Harcourt has ordered its editors to stop acquiring books for the foreseeable future. Bad news all around.

It seems to this humble observer that planet earth is having a profound near-death experience. Global warming predictions now tell us that far worse climactic catastrophes will happen before mid-century. Earlier predictions of environmental collapse were too conservative. Add to this what could have been preventable wars, famine, disease, and economic catastrophe, and we have the makings of a nice little apocalypse.

Here’s the irony: the prophets’ voices are not being heard as loudly as they should be. Why? Because fewer books are being published. Yes, there are many fine nonfiction books that are sending out dire warnings, but the general publishing climate, as seen above, is not healthy.

But maybe it’s a moot issue. Are we really educating a new generation of readers? Or are we producing a world of young adults who read nothing longer than the social networking on iPhones, Blackberries, and Facebook? With each passing day, I become more of an iconoclast.



Digg!


Read more!

Sunday, November 23, 2008

Two Great Writing Sites: New Pages and NewPages Blog

If you’re looking for reviews, publishing news, contests, literary trends, or a place to submit your work, try one of these sites. “(To see the rest of this post, click “Read More” below.)



Both NewPages Blog and New Pages offer a wealth of information on writing. There are numerous links to other great online writing pages at both sites. New Pages has received major endorsements and accepts submissions for your work. Highly recommended!

The New Pages badge is in the far right sidebar, as are the links to these two sites under Acclaimed Writing Resources.


Digg!


Read more!

Saturday, November 22, 2008

Amateur Creativity: Pathway to a Paradigm Shift

Lawrence Lessig is an author whose books should definitely be on your “get to” list. He is an expert on the Internet, creativity, and commerce. Great combination, eh? (To read the rest of this post, click on “Read Me” below.)



Lessig is the author of such books as The Future of Ideas, Remix, Code, and Free Culture. The main thesis throughout his work is that advanced technology has created the possibility of “amateur creativity.” But this phrase is not used in the pejorative. On the contrary, Lessig believes that humanity can now do more than recite and assimilate lessons in school. With the advent of the Internet, websites, and blogs, people have outlets to create their own work, usually emulating others they have seen or read online.

Is this bad? If so, then the curriculum goals of schools—seldom if ever read by anyone at all—have been off the mark. In Liberal Arts, goal statements have long aimed toward students nurturing the creative side of their personalities. They may not become the next Hemingway or Faulkner, but the right side of the brain is finally being developed. Art is giving science a run for its money.

This relates to two of my former posts: Literary Chaos Theory and Finding Your Own Narrative Voice. The latter advocated imitation as a path to ultimately discovering a distinctive style. The first put forth the belief that ideas and creativity cannot be stifled indefinitely by the major publishing conglomerates. I think Lessig’s ideas are in total sync with these ideas (or for humility’s sake, I’m in sync with his.)

We are currently at the very beginning of a technology that is global and offers creative outlets that will surely evolve over the next decade. Think about it. Perhaps finally we will get past the “science and math” blah-blah and realize that the total mind must be educated. Science without art is impoverished and sterile. If this truly happens, innovation will indeed find a way to blossom in a climate in which the current publishing industry has put up its conglomerate roadblocks. In ten years, we may look back at POD titles or blogs and realize that they have given birth to a new paradigm in writing and the arts. And that’s a good thing.



Digg!


Read more!

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Joe the Plumber vs. the Integrity of Language

Joe the Plumber has a book deal, according to Publishers Weekly. Called Fighting for the American Dream, the book will be published by PearlGate Publishing according to Huffingtonpost.com. Okay, let’s play a version of “What’s Wrong with This Picture” as seen in Children’s Highlights Magazine. (To see the rest of this post, click on “Read More” below.)



There are hard-working writers out there who can actually write their own books. Joe’s not one of them, and I wouldn’t ghostwrite his book for a gazillion dollars because he’s a jerk. Before you fight for the American Dream, how about doing the following, Joe: 1) give your correct name, which is Sam; 2) get a license before you call yourself a plumber; 3) pay your delinquent taxes before you start your holier-than-thou rants about socialism, the definition of which is probably far beyond your comprehension; 4) and don’t lie about wanting to buy a business when you A) have no intention of doing so, and B) don’t have the money. You’re fighting for the American Dream? Exactly what dream is that, Joe? Scamming the American public?

Joe’s gaming the system, thanks to the GOP ticket and PearlGate. Looking for that fifteen minutes of fame. But let’s not mince words: He’s a prostitute. And people who pay for prostitutes are called “johns.” That makes PearlGate Publishing a john. Yeah, I know that publishers acquire the latest fad or celeb all the time. Money, money, money. But I find it particularly odious that PearlGate is pimping out Joe by making a liar and a fraud into an American hero.

Obama told Joe on the rope-line while campaigning that he wanted to “spread the wealth,” meaning that he wished to make adjustments in the Progressive Tax Code, which has existed since 1916. All legislation (and not just overtly monetary legislation) redistributes wealth in some way, shape, or form. (George W. redistributed money by tax breaks for upper-income Americans.) You may like or dislike tax cuts for the middle class, but it’s called legislation and government, not socialism.

But we in America have become so unable to understand the connotation and context of words that an entire movement can gain momentum based on pure ignorance of language (not to mention History 101). And publishers, the alleged guardians of the printed word, are willing to play upon that ignorance while sending out rejection slips to legitimate authors with great books that seek to ennoble mankind through learned discourse and sound ideas.

So thanks, PearlGate, for selling us all down the river another few miles as our country and culture tries to find its bearings at a watershed moment in American history, one that demands honesty and integrity. In this story, the written word is the big loser of the day.



Digg!


Read more!

Sunday, November 16, 2008

Paperback Dreams: A PBS Documentary for People Who Love Books

Husband-wife team Bridget Warren and Todd Stewart own an independent bookstore, Vertigo Books. Times are tough for independent booksellers, so after trying a “please buy from us” campaign in order to stay afloat, they decided, in tandem with filmmaker Alex Beckstead, to screen Beckstead’s new PBS documentary, Paperback Dreams, at their own bookstore. (To see the rest of this post, click “Read More” below.)



Bridget and Todd are but a few people trying to keep independent stores open, stores that were once small, friendly environments where one could find books, not only from major publishers, but offerings from small and independent presses with quirky fiction or controversial titles. These smaller stores were laboratories for the unconventional, evolving from both counterculture stores in the sixties as well as mom and pop operations, where readers could find what they wanted at the corner rather than the mall.

Paperback Dreams is a one-hour documentary that will air on PBS after it finishes the screening process. It’s the story of two famous “indie” booksellers who have struggled to survive: Andy Ross, owner of Cody’s Books, and Clark Kepler, owner of Kepler’s Books. Both men have fought vandalism and harassment because they chose, over the years, to carry books on pacifism and counterculture, or titles such as Salmen Rushdie’s The Satanic Verses. Cody’s was firebombed in 1989.

The documentary shows how indies had decent sales as late as 1993, before Barnes and Noble spread their mega-chain across the country—and before the biggest "indie impediments" of all took root in mainstream American culture, Amazon.com and the Internet, impacting the publishing industry forever. Check local listings, as the cliché goes, to find out when this great doc about people who love books will be shown in your area. Also, find out much more about the documentary at the film's really cool promotional site, Paperback Dreams.

We already know that major publishing houses are limiting the number of titles published, but with each passing year, conglomerates are now determining who can sell books, and where. Did I just hear the name “Orwell”—again?



Digg!


Read more!

Friday, November 14, 2008

The Ultimate List of Writing Tips You'll Never Find in a How-to Book: Part 1

The following is a part of a much longer list of tips I compiled while teaching writing at universities for twenty years (I started young!). While many tips are eccentric or intentionally humorous, all are tendered as serious ways to tap into the well of creativity. This will be the first in a series. To read the list, click on “Read More” below.




1) When you get a rejection slip, correct it for errors in grammar, spelling and usage. It will boost your ego.

2) Make up fifty words that don’t exist—but should.

3) Pay attention to your thoughts while you shave, stand in line, clean fish, etc. You can learn more from life than reading books on creating believable plots and interesting characters.

4) Buy a how-to book and throw darts at it so you don’t take rules too seriously.

5) Talk back to the people on TV (preferably when no one else is in the house). This will give you attitude, first cousin to narrative style.

6) Turn the sound off altogether on TV and make up your own dialogue.

7) Always record or photograph graffiti. It will give you insight into the human psyche.

8) Write stream of consciousness frequently and see if it turns into something.

9) Listen to a string quartet and follow a single instrument all the way through. It develops focus and teaches you how to handle subplots.

10) Listen to old people. Don’t write down what they’re saying. Just listen.

11) Attend a political rally at campaign headquarters. Observe the foolish hats, buttons, slogans, and drunken behavior. You will learn how to write satire.

12) Make a graffiti board in your house, a big one with tear-off pages. Scribble meaningless phrases when the spirit moves you. Writing “Marie wears neon underwear” is a lot more interesting than writing a journal entry about the failings of your spouse, boss, etc.

13) Ponder human nature while looking at the pages of Gray’s Anatomy.

14) Smile and wave to everyone you meet. You’ll soon learn that the world is divided into optimism and grave suspicion. This may help you decide genre, narrative voice, POV, and theme.

15) Write, “I am a great writer” 100 times. (Turning the pages into a nun is optional.) If you don’t believe in your talent, who else will?

16) Collect one piece of junk a week and write about it.

17) Go to yard sales and observe the dregs of other people’s lives.

18) Listen to conversation coming from nearby tables at restaurants.

19) Watch Marx Brothers movies when you get writers block and think you don’t understand plotting.

20) Write in a different genre once in a while to exercise the right side of your brain.

21) Read Publexicon frequently to receive more tips and learn the wit and wisdom of William Hammett, who can trace his genealogy to England, circa 1248, where his earliest ancestor was a village idiot. (I’m not making this up.)

22) Learn to cook an entire meal. It will teach you how to handle subplots.

23) Study old black and white historical photographs. They are evocative and filled with intriguing detail for which you must supply motive, plot, etc.

24) Write longhand occasionally. It will put you in touch with the language in a new and dynamic way, connecting your brain directly with the words.

25) Write a story every day in five sentences or less. It will teach you what needs to be said and what doesn’t.



Digg!


Read more!

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Writing: When the Pressure Is Off

When I was in grad school, I was exposed to a book titled Uptaught by Ken Macrorie. It’s out-of-print now, but it was one of the most influential books I ever read on the subject of how to teach writing. (To see the rest of this post, click “Read More” below.)



This assumes that writing can be taught to begin with, for I firmly believe that the best writing teachers are mentors, nothing more. Every student must find his or her own way. But that is exactly what this book was about.

The book’s thesis was very simple: stop telling kids what to write about. Let students choose their own subject matter within very broad parameters. And go easy on the grading (not that commentary should be avoided altogether). What incentive is there for a kid to do better when he or she is told that intimate thoughts are trash?

Macrorie, a professor at the University of Michigan, obtained the following results after several years of departing from the traditional writing curriculum: as if by magic, students didn’t make nearly as many grammatical mistakes; organization seemed to take care of itself; and the writing was fresh, descriptions were vivid. The students stopped writing dull essays, what Macrorie called “Engfish,” a word that occasionally cropped up in “regular” writing assignments. He found that when students were genuinely interested in a topic, many of the rules took care of themselves. I think this applies to writers of all ages.

The lesson is simple. Real writing doesn’t come from a textbook. It comes from inspiration. Traditional writing courses are similar to teaching kids to never color outside the lines. (The Anti-Coloring Book encourages children to form some of the picture lines themselves.) Such courses produce conformity, not creativity. Rules there must be … but I’m suspicious of most of them.



Digg!


Read more!

Monday, November 10, 2008

Writing as a Mystical Journey

Are we as writers mere messengers of what it is that wants to be said? Are we the expression for a power that needs vehicles in space-time to touch the lives of others? Not bad work when you can get it. If this is true, then it doesn’t diminish our roles as writers—quite the opposite—but it does most definitely call for an attitude of openness and humility. (To see the rest of this post, click “Read More” below.)




The idea that all artists are vehicles of a greater power is nothing new. The first time I was consciously exposed to the concept, however, was when I heard “The Wedding Song” by Noel Paul Stookey, the “Paul” of Peter, Paul and Mary. The song became the nation’s all-time leading seller of sheet music, but Stookey passed up royalties. He felt that the song had been given to him and that he could not rightly claim authorship. He had gone through a profound religious experience, and when I listened to him speak at PP&M concerts, he talked about being used, about being the vehicle for what it is that wanted to be said. That got my attention.

In the years that followed, I heard and read that many artists through the ages had also felt this way: that art is a sacred pathway, and artists are mere conduits for “the message.” I believe that this is true, regardless of the media or genre we use, whether we are singers, writers, painters, photographers—and the list goes on.

This doesn’t mean that we get preachy or must be denominational in our efforts. What I think it means—and I’d like to hear what you have to say about this—is that we try to write from a wellspring that represents honesty and truth. Can this be accomplished when writing for pure entertainment, be it a a mystery, a thriller, or sci fi? Of course! I believe that the “spiritual writer” (insert “mystical writer” if necessary—it works just as well)—raises themes that trigger a reaction, conscious or unconscious, that may resonate with the reader. This is where humility comes in. I believe our best attempts bring a reader to a doorway or a path, a point at which the transaction then becomes a matter between the reader and God, Universe, Source, Light—call “It” what you will. This is why every writer must, at some point, step out of the way and let the work take on its own life and accomplish its purpose in its own way. A book or movie may inspire ten people … in ten different ways.

If all this is true, then we have to, to a greater or lesser degree according to our own belief systems, relinquish our power over the very words we use. Yes, writing is sometimes fluid and sometimes torturous, but ultimately, we have to realize that we don’t own the words. And if we’re especially good writers, we lose ownership of our characters as well. We cannot tell them what to. They must tell us.

So how does this translate into the actual methodology of composition? My own opinion has been dictated by a book I ceaselessly recommend to everyone: Zen in the Art of Writing by Ray Bradbury. We have to stop the constant minute-by-minute editing, the constant urge to start over. Bradbury advises to let the fingers and the brain communicate while we and our obsessive thoughts take a walk while the real work is being done. It’s a question of getting into a zone where we are a bit out of phase with reality and find that time passes differently. For Bradbury, writing is joy, a process where a few keystrokes begins to kick us into gear.

Yes, easier said than done. We are all sons and daughters of Adam, and on any given day, I drive my writing right into a ditch. And yet I believe my best ideas are not the ones I’ve outlined or thought a great deal about. They originate from the words on my tongue when I awake, not knowing why they’re there. Or they’re the result of incredible synchronicities that point me in a given direction (as was the case with my last novel under my own name).

The question that writers get the most is “Where do you get your ideas?” I just smile. I don’t think I have a coherent reply. The answer is in the doing, and that process transcends the very words we use.



Digg!


Read more!

Saturday, November 8, 2008

Finding Your Own Narrative Voice

I’ve read books on writing that say there are only so many styles, so “choose one and write your story.” Well, maybe, maybe not. Granted, many books—even ones that are very well written and engaging—exhibit a “meat and potatoes” style, with prose that uses little subordination. Dan Brown is a perfect example. I don’t regard Brown as a prose stylist—his syntax is straightforward, and his sentences and paragraphs are short—and yet he is master of pacing and plot. One could say the same thing about Papa Hemingway’s prose, and yet consider how far apart the styles of these two writers are. (To see the rest of this post, click “Read More” below.)



Style involves nuance, and for an expert linguist, style is almost a matter of forensics. One’s prose style is like a fingerprint. But how does one find his or her distinctive style? We are, after all, born with our fingerprints, so by analogy, is there an innate style in each one of us? Maybe to some degree, but I think nurture beats nature on this one, hands down.

I believe that, first and foremost, what we read as we grow up affects our prose style. As we get older, we then tend to gravitate to the styles of our favorite author or authors. (As a writing teacher for twenty years, I’ve found this to be the rule rather than the exception.) That’s not necessarily a bad thing, but ultimately we want to bring something of ourselves to the page. Easier said than done, right? Here’s my solution to the conundrum.

Many years ago, I tried to imitate one author after another simply because it was fun (or because I was particularly impressed with a given writer after reading a page turner). And then the day came when I stared at a blank page—and then stared some more. Finally I just started to write, putting away all internal censorship, all voices urging me to go this way or that. Four hundred pages later, I was astonished to find that my narrative voice had unconsciously incorporated many of the authors I had imitated, but so many had gotten mixed together that a totally new style had formed inside me noggin.

I think imitation has a bad rap. It’s a tool of exploration, and after enough experimentation, it gives one a greater command of syntactic possibilities. Of course, after a certain point, one must leave the safety of the styles we love for the undiscovered country.



Digg!


Read more!

What Kind of Writing Do You Concentrate On?

What do you spend most of your time writing? Novels? Short Stories? Flash Fiction? Poetry? Juvenile? Nonfiction? Blogging? Take the survey in the far right sidebar!








Digg!


Read more!

Publishers Weekly Best Books of 2008

For a list of amazing books, see Publishers Weekly Best Books of the Year
Digg!





And here is the rest of it.


Read more!

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Literary Chaos Theory

Indulge me for a moment. Recall Jurassic Park, in which Jeff Goldblum’s character, a mathematician, warned that the dinosaurs would reproduce regardless of how much genetic engineering was used by island owner John Hammond. Nature, he said, would find a way around man’s arrogant, controlling instincts through the mechanism of Chaos Theory. Now apply that same rationale to the very tight, downsized literary marketplace. (To see more of this post, click “Read More” below.)



Getting published is tougher than ever, but I firmly believe that ideas, like nature, cannot be contained, at least not indefinitely. Call it Literary Chaos Theory. The unexpected always happens. Regardless of the impediments set up by man in any area where dynamism and energy are in play, innovation always succeeds because it is encoded in the same genes that ensure individual and species survival. Global warming is also an excellent analogy. Despite mankind’s paltry attempts to control technology and the environment, Mother Nature is weighing in with a vengeance.

Of the hundreds of publishing houses that are familiar to the book-buying public, most are imprints of publishing conglomerates like Viacom or Time Warner (or names that few would recognize). But can these conglomerates restrain the flow of literature indefinitely? Will the number of books published continue to dwindle? Will literary agencies eventually shut down slushpiles altogether, the way publishers have? Will publication be controlled by a select few?

I say unequivocally “no.” Print-on-Demand is currently an option for authors at the very fringe of the publishing world. The average POD title is overpriced, not carried by brick-and-mortar chains, and sells an average of 148 copies. Not very encouraging. But remember: for over a decade, people laughed at the bulky Apple prototypes at the dawn of the computer revolution. Eventually PCs took over, and Mac itself has come roaring back (the computer, not the candidate). PCs then merged with the Defense Department’s odd communication system called “The Internet,” and a new world was born.

No one knows the future of POD. It may evolve into a more marketable form, with better editorial controls and newer methods of distribution. If so, that would throw the conglomerates on their ears. Or POD titles may eventually fall into a tiered rating system, allowing some titles to rise to the top. The possibilities are endless. Small and independent presses might be born, scavenging for the best POD titles, which would then go farther and farther into the mainstream.

Blogging is another example. Millions of people are published everyday, and much in the blogosphere is excellent work. Ideas go viral, and a few enterprising college kids recently sold their blog content to a publisher for a hefty six-figure advance.


These are just speculations. What will actually happen probably can’t be predicted, but ideas throughout human history can be suppressed for only so long. Ideas, words—they’ll find a way into the literary marketplace, and then Viacom will be left scratching its head as it listens to the sound of dinosaurs thudding down Madison Avenue. Sooner or later, the literary river will jump its banks. You heard it here first.



Digg!


Read more!

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

The Agents We Love to Hate, Part 2

The following is not an isolated incident. It has happened to me (and others) many times, and the scenario below is becoming more common. And lest one think that I am ranting because I can’t “break through,” I have published under my own name, and some of my ghostwriting clients have also been quite successful in the literary marketplace, with hardcover and paperback deals. And let me reiterate what I said in Part One: agents are good people with a lot of material to sift through. That having been said, (To see the rest of this post, click on “Read More” below.)



there are accountability issues that need to be explored.

Three years ago, I submitted a query to an A-list agent with a great sales record at a major New York agency. After only two weeks, she enthusiastically asked to look at the entire manuscript, which I mailed the next day. I knew from experience not to pester the woman since I wasn’t the only person seeking representation. After six months, however, I believed—and still do—that it was fair game to ask for a response. I was told by the agent’s assistant that they had indeed received my manuscript and SASE and would get to it, probably within the month. Fine and dandy, I thought to myself.

Three months later (and nine months after the submission), I sent a friendly little inquiry to the assistant as to whether they were any closer to making a decision. She informed me that she had just endured root canal work and was behind in her reading. Root canal work. That can’t be good, I thought. I’m a patient man, and so I waited. The agency, after all, was very prestigious.

Three months later (and one year after my submission), I sent another friendly email into cyberspace, asking the assistant if she knew the status of my manuscript—and “I sure hope the root canal went okay!” She made a warm reply, explaining that she had been hit with jury duty but that she and her boss would be giving me a decision within three weeks.

Three weeks came and went, and I pretty much wrote off representation with this agency. But I was miffed because it had cost me twenty-three dollars to mail the manuscript and enclose a large SASE. I also wanted to know what happened to the original enthusiasm about my work. After six more months, I contacted the agent herself and explained the nature of the correspondence I’d had with her assistant and asked if she could give me a decision. I received a terse reply that said, “We are extremely busy, and if my assistant says she’s going to get to your manuscript, then she most certainly will. We apologize for the delay.” A bit snippy, don’t you think?

Another six months passed, but there was no reply. It was now two years after the manuscript had been requested, and I had moved on to other projects with other agencies. Just for fun, I emailed the agent and copied the assistant, explaining that I understood how many submissions they received but that mailing entire manuscripts was expensive and that I thought I deserved an answer. I didn’t receive a reply from the agent or assistant. Silence.

Can you imagine when this happens for “exclusive submissions”? I myself ignore the exclusive part of the request after three months, and indeed, I now forward manuscripts with the understanding that a request for an “exclusive” must receive a reply within one month. (In other words, I set a deadline but cut ‘em a bit of slack.)

There’s no reason to treat authors like this. Once an agent requests a manuscript, there should be some professional guidelines that govern the response, the same kind of guidelines that agents themselves insist on in the initial submission process. If they don’t want to follow the professional protocols that they themselves always preach about, I have one bit of advice: take your name out of the directories and quit taking submissions.





Digg!


Read more!

Saturday, November 1, 2008

2008 Is the New 1984

George Orwell wrote 1984, heavily influenced by his view of totalitarian regimes, while ill with tuberculosis, and the book was published in 1949. It would become a defining work of literature during the Cold War years and the rise of the Soviet Union. But have we learned the lessons of this brilliant novel? I think not, especially in light of recent events in the United States. (To see the rest of this post, click “Read More” below.)



The idea that “he who is not for us is against us” seems to be alive and well in the campaign of John McCain for president. Insinuations that Barack Obama is a communist, socialist, and terrorist have been thrown around by McCain, Sarah Palin, and Congresswoman Michelle Bachman of Minnesota, the latter advocating an investigation of Congress to find un-American legislators in our nation’s capitol. (These are just a few of the hundreds of people in the ’08 campaign who have resurrected an Orwellian world in which Big Brother tells us what to believe as rallies are stirred into frenzied hate mobs directly from the pages of 1984, where crowds screamed insults at the imaginary enemy, Goldstein.)

This all smacks of Tailgunner Joe McCarthy’s commie witch hunts in the early 1950s. McCain can no longer be considered a man of honor, having refused to repudiate the name-calling at his rallies except in a watered-down, after-the-fact manner. He and Palin knew exactly what they were doing, and although it has backfired as a campaign strategy, it resonated with enough Americans to give us all pause and wonder if we have learned anything from history. Palin herself bragged about “spreading the wealth in Alaska” shortly after receiving the Republican VP nomination, citing that in Alaska, people share the resources, enabling her to give back the money to everyone and “spread the wealth.” I suspect she forgot her own quote.

Chris Matthews said it best: Barack Obama has done everything that bigoted white America has asked of African Americans for years, and yet it still isn’t good enough for many. It is 2008, and we have witnessed Orwellian mobs screaming words of utter contempt and hate because a few speakers stirred their listeners with absurd charges and ridiculous labels. The recent federal economic bailout, as well as Medicare and Social Security, is most definitely socialist in nature, but no one is screaming at FDR or Lyndon Johnson, calling them socialists.

It’s chilling. We repeat the mistakes of history because we don’t learn from it. And why is that? Because our schools assign 1984 and other classics, knowing that they rent the movies or buy the Cliffs Notes. With exceptions, our children don’t read the classics. Reading programs and the language arts curricula are jokes—and have been ever since we decided to make math and science a priority in schools after the launch of Sputnik in 1957. Disagree? Then why are people screaming at rallies, demanding the murder of a candidate because foolish, ambitious John McCain twisted the connotation of a few words into absurdity?



Digg!


Read more!

Studs Terkel Dies at Age 96

Prolific author and radio host Studs Terkel died yesterday, October 31, 2008. Terkel won the Pulitzer Prize in 1985 for The Good War, a book chronicling the unity shared by Americans during World War II. (To see the rest of this post, click “Read More” below.)



Terkel started in radio and did everything from music programs to soap operas to commercials. He is best known for interviews with (and books about) regular working people. He had an uncanny way of finding the pulse of the average American and setting it down in honest, moving prose. He was also an activist and was keenly interested in securing healthcare for uninsured Americans. He remained active until very recently, always sitting next to his typewriter, refusing to give up writing and totally unafraid of death.


To learn more about this extraordinary man and his work, visit Studs Terkel




Digg!


Read more!

Friday, October 31, 2008

Thoughts on NaNoWriMo: National Novel Writing Month

National Novel Writing Month—NaNoWriMo—starts tomorrow. I Googled the phrase and found that NaNo is quite controversial, with many writers and critics suggesting that it is an inane, useless project. Permit me to disagree. (To see the rest of this post, click “Read Me” below.)



First, it is never a waste of time to write, to set pen to paper or feverishly pound the PC keyboard. Call me mystical, but no act of creation is ever wasted. Second, we live at a time when education is considered to be a question of strengthening math and science scores. Literacy in general is at an all-time low, with high school and college graduates reading and writing at grammar school grade levels. People can’t think, can’t express themselves.

As for NaNo, I agree that it is a project that flies in the face conventional wisdom—the act of getting to the word count regardless of plot or theme. It also neglects what agents have told me for the past five years: 65,000 words is a minimum limit for adult fiction to be considered (although we all can probably think of exceptions). And yet it is not impossible to produce a good novel if one is able to somehow put life on hold for thirty days. (I myself couldn’t do it, and I make my living as a ghostwriter collaborating with authors, usually published.) It’s damned hard, and yet Ray Bradbury, a writer who has considerable insight into the creative process, wrote the rough draft of Fahrenheit 451 in seven days. Seven. He said, “I was motivated.”


Critics of NaNo miss the point. It is first and foremost an exercise in focus and dedication. It is for those who love language and feel compelled to try against all odds because they have a calling, because it's in their blood. Beyond that, who is to say that someone won’t produce a work that, at the very least, is worthy of revision and ultimate submission? Writing is a mystical process. I would never belittle NaNo—or anyone who says, “I want to write.”



Digg!


Read more!

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Writers Digest Guide to Literary Agents: A Failing Grade

I spent several hours early this year (and last year as well) checking out listings in Writers Digest Guide to Literary Agents. In the listings I examined, I found over forty percent of the information to be incorrect. (To see the rest of this post, click “Read More” below.)



It’s true that agents frequently move to other agencies, but the errors I found were egregious and indicated that proofreading must be all but absent at Writers Digest. If I can find hundreds of errors in a few hours, I think it’s a safe bet that Writers Digest could find a few interns to sit down and do exactly what I did. And what exactly did I do? I compared the entries to agency websites when such were available. Next, I checked the listings against Jeff Herman’s Guide to Book Publishers, Editors, & Literary Agents. I then used a simple white page search to check on addresses and phone numbers. Finally, I Googled agent and agency names to find out whatever info I could about an agent. I sent the editor of the directory several emails to inform her of my findings. All went unanswered.

The errors fall into several categories. Many phone numbers and street addresses are off by one or more digits. Some are completely wrong. Anyone can make a proofreading error, but when so many are off by a digit or two, then the publisher should either start thinking about handing out refunds or running a convenience store.

It was also disturbing to see such disparity between listings and websites in the matter of what an agency represents. Legion are the fiction genres that are incorrectly included or erroneously omitted. One can postulate that the directory is simply regurgitating the incorrect responses given by the agents, but for so many listings? It’s more probable that the directory continues to list out-of-date information for agencies that have no objection to being included but fail to update their profiles. A few agencies had been listed for up to three years after going out of business.

I also found that agents listed as being with an agency were no longer there, and again, there were instances in which the agent had left for greener pastures at least one to two years earlier.

Submission requirements in Writers Digest were also very erratic when compared to those listed on agency websites. As agencies get stricter in their submission requirements, this info needs to be up-to-date to avoid a massive waste of time on the part of authors. All of the above errors also impact the pocketbook. A lot of postage is wasted because the directory can’t take the time to check its information.

I don’t expect the directory to be perfect since agencies do change personnel and locations frequently, but if I can find the right info, then so can Writers Digest. One wonders, however, if the publisher cares. Getting an agent is like winning the lottery. Probably less than ten percent of all readers secure an agent, and of those, probably two percent end up with a publishing contract. And if you tell me that Writers Digest doesn’t know this, then I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.



Digg!


Read more!

Selecting a Literary Agent

Your work is finished and now comes the scary part: securing literary representation since most major publishing houses, imprints of publishing conglomerates, are now closed to unagented submissions. It is a daunting process to select the right agents to query and then send out a bit of your soul in emails and envelopes. Where does one begin? (To read the rest of this post, click “Read More” below.)



There are numerous online sources for literary agents, but the two “bibles” for selecting an agent are still Writer’s Digest Guide to Literary Agents and Jeff Herman’s Guide to Book Publishers, Editors, & Literary Agents. Both books give detailed listings for agents, as well as articles on the current state of the literary marketplace. Herman’s directory is a bit more selective, offering fewer agent listings, but his listings tend to be more detailed and offer personal insights from participating agents. The Writer’s Digest directory has far more listings, but about one-fifth of the information is already out-of-date (or simply incorrect) by the time new editions hit the bookstores each year. This directory, whenever possible, should be cross-referenced with online listings when agencies publish their web addresses. This enables an author to double-check info, such as street addresses, telephone numbers, the kind of material that is represented, and a list of agents and sub-agents. You’ll soon find that Writer’s Digest, however useful it may be, does not proofread its entries carefully for basic information. Zip codes, telephone numbers, and street address numbers are often “off” by one or more numbers—or completely incorrect. It’s common for agents to move from one agency to another, but some listings show agents still at an agency even though the agents have moved on years ago. Submission requirements also don’t tally in many instances.

Assuming an agency has published its URL (or is accessible through Google), it is always preferable to get info straight from the agency’s website. You will more often than not find a complete and contemporary list of agents and what they prefer to represent, as well as their sales records. You can also gain some insights into their personal interests and get a feel for who they are. You can also find new agents at large agencies that are in the process of building new client lists and therefore more willing to look at unpublished authors. These listings are invaluable because they give the exact submission requirements that other directories haven’t gotten correct.

If allowed by an agency, it is probably a good choice to send an email query. Agents tend to check their email on a daily basis, whereas they get to their slush piles whenever they can. Email queries therefore tend to get faster responses. Always follow submission requirements to the letter, but be prepared to wait a very long time for some agencies to respond. Additionally, be prepared to 1) not receive any reply at all, or 2) get back a rejection slip minus the sample chapters you have forwarded despite the proper postage. Lastly, if a manuscript is requested, don’t assume that it will be returned in a timely fashion—or ever. All authors have their own horror stories to share, but in the last five years, it has become more and more common to receive no reply from agencies, even regarding requested manuscripts, whether complete or partials. Fortunately, this doesn’t apply to all agents, but it happens.

But how many agents should you submit to? Most agents allow simultaneous submissions. Some don’t. It’s a numbers game in the end, and it is wise to submit to between five to ten agents at a time. If you get three to five requests after submitting to fifty agents, you’re ahead of the game, although if your work is outstanding you may get many more. If an agent wants to see your work and asks for an exclusive look, honor that stipulation but insist that the agent get back to you in a reasonable amount of time (a month being reasonable). If you were to submit your manuscript exclusively to twenty agents who take their sweet time to read it, you’d be in the nursing home by the time you got all of your replies.

Submitting manuscripts can be frustrating. For fiction, it was once possible to submit a one-page query letter and three sample chapters. These days, you may find an agent requesting the first chapter(s) of a book, then the first fifty to one hundred pages, then the entire work. The entire process can take up to a year and a half. There are, of course, exceptions. For nonfiction, you must submit a detailed book proposal with many components, such as your hook, a synopsis, an outline, your marketing platform, credentials, bio, and other elements. The book doesn’t necessarily have to be written if you clearly demonstrate an ability to write or complete the work.

Suppose you succeed in getting an agent’s attention. How do you know if it’s the right agent? This is where it gets interesting. Don’t be timid. Ask the agent for his or her track record. Inquire as to whether he or she makes multiple submissions and ask how many contacts he has for your genre. Every agent has to start somewhere, but if your prospective agent hasn’t sold many titles over a period of two years or has never been apprenticed with publishers or other agencies, then you may want to think long and hard about whether to sign on. Most agencies don’t have contracts, although some offer year-long contracts with termination possible with a thirty-day notice.

Never sign with an agent who refers you to a book doctor, who will allegedly take your work and make it into a bestseller for a few thousand dollars. This arrangement is usually a kickback scheme—and a scam. If you have any suspicions about an agent, check with online watchdog groups such as Preditors & Editors, Absolute Write, or Writer Beware. The links for these sites are on the Publexicon blog.

Every agent is different. They’re human like anyone else. Some are warm and open, others are curmudgeons. Others won’t give you the time of day. Take a deep breath and give it a go. There’s one way to never get published: let all this stuff intimidate you. Get out your stamps and run the gauntlet. Nothing ventured, nothing gained.



Digg!


Read more!

Monday, October 27, 2008

Writing Naked: An Artistic Necessity

No, this isn’t a post about writing au natural (although that conjures up an interesting image), nor is it about attracting readers by using catchy titles or lurid dust jacket blurb. The truth is that all writers must expose themselves, must be willing to strip away a certain amount of privacy in order to get solid ideas down on paper or PC screen. (To see the rest of this post, click “Read More” below.)



In a real sense, therefore, if you’re going to put a poem, short story, or novel “out there” for all to see, you’ve got to be willing to stand naked and say, “This is me. This is my work. Whaddya think?”

But even before your work finds a public forum, you have to “take it all off” during the composition process. When writing, you’re tapping into your soul, consciously or unconsciously. You have to be willing to put aside for a while the internal censor we all have so you can connect with the truth of a character, setting, or plot. That doesn’t mean you throw out all sense of decorum or reveal deep dark secrets about yourself (although this happens sometimes, for better or worse).

Whatever you choose to put on paper is a revelation about your mindset, your thinking, your worldview, your most cherished beliefs. Does this mean that it’s always necessary to write from experience? No, although these core values may well result from your experiences, but belief and imagination transcend experience. I suppose it’s possible to deliberately cloak who we are in any given piece, but in the long run I believe that artists make a pact to give up their privacy in order to make a statement of greater or lesser import. It’s an act of sacrifice--a revealing one.

You may not find yourself naked all at once, but if you keep writing long enough, you may find that you you’re doing a striptease of the soul.



Digg!


Read more!

The 21st Annual Independent and Small Press Book Fair

The 21st Annual Independent & Small Press Book Fair will be held in New York City on December 6 and 7, 2008. The fair is open to all presses that have published at least one book. (To see the rest of this post, click on “Read More” below.)



Members of the media that usually attend are The Village Voice, Kirkus Reviews, Library Journal, The New York Times, and The New York Sun. Publishers unable to attend may display books at the fair’s Cooperative Exhibit Room. For more information, please visit The New York Center for Independent Publishing


Digg!


Read more!

Saturday, October 25, 2008

Agents We Love to Hate, Part I

Agents are good people, not very much different from you and me. They’re overworked and must sift through a mountain of queries in their slushpiles each week. I’ve had good relations with many and have always appreciated their time. That having been said, there are those who operate under “Do as I say, not do as I do.” (To see the rest of this post, click “Read More" below.)



Agents frequently list the following advice in their directory listings: “Proofread for grammar. Queries with major errors will either be thrown away or returned immediately.” Okay, but here are some replies I’ve received from major A-list agents in the Big Apple over the years, agents who have rightfully demanded perfect grammar. They are reproduced exactly as they were written and printed.

“Dear Author,
Thanks for the opportunity to read your work, unfortunately it is not quit right for out list. We encourage you to submit to other agencies since tastes vary considerably, best of luck.”


I’ll take run-ons and typos for $500, Alex.

“Dear ________,
Thanks you for sending us a copy of you’re work for us too read. Regrettably it is not right for us.
Sincerely,
_______________”



Spelling and repetitous phrasing for $200, Alex.

“Dear Author,
We appreciate you thinking of our agency, but we has a full list at present. Best of luck in your publishing endeavors.”


I’ll takes subject-verb agreement for $1,000, Alex.


How hard is it to proofread a two-line form rejection slip? Agents are human, but if they can’t walk the walk, don’t talk the talk. It’s hypocritical.




Digg!


Read more!

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Writing and Blogging: Finding the Audience You Want

There are hundreds of blogs devoted to nothing else but the art of instructing you on how to make your blog more appealing, driving traffic to your blog, and showing bloggers how to break into the Technorati Top 100. That’s all well and good, but (To see the rest of this post, click “Read More” below.)



roughly half of the top blogs listed by Technorati have been a) manipulated by using clever linking tricks, and b) are sponsored by companies that have put considerable financial resources into sponsoring the blog and use SEO techniques that are very pricey when dealing with a Google adwords account. (I won’t even bother to comment on the numerous young Asian women who wangle their way into the Top 100 by using MySpace in conjunction with numerous other tricks that call for one to give up the day job.)

The advice on becoming a top blogger also includes using Twitter, Flickr, del.icio.so, Stumble, Reddit, Furl, Digg, Dugg, Dang-it-all, Geritol, Flutter, Pooper, Dasher, Dancer, Doc, Sleazy, and Dopey. And yes, use bells and whistles and pictures and all the rest. I have no problem with any of it, but the only thing these blogging sites consistently “get right” is that content is what matters. If you write what you believe in, you’re going to find an audience, and in the present climate of the Orwellian literary marketplace, that ain’t a bad thing at all.

What these blogging sites “get wrong” is to say, “Don’t write about your pets or kids or hobbies. It’s boring.” Oh yeah? Says who? When I read these know-it-all sites by Uppity Snoot, I feel I’m once again dealing with the gatekeepers in New York who are limiting what can and cannot be published or determining how widely ideas will be disseminated. Some of my favorite blogs are well-written pieces about kids and the daily trials of life. In fact, I like very few of the “top blogs.” I like real writing by real people, people who have something to say because they’ve lived it, believe in it, and are willing to take an hour from their day to write about it, whatever “it” may be.

That’s writing. Damn the site meters and damn the “authority” on Technorati. There’s only one rule of blogging as far as I’m concerned: Write what you want and make it the truth.” Content counts. Your content.



Digg!


Read more!

National Novel Writing Month

National Novel Writing Month is almost upon us. If you are up to the challenge of producing 50K words in the month of November, please head on over to NaNoWriMo This is a great exercise, and NaNoWriMo is one of Writers Digest top 100 writing sites.



It's the best way to get rid of writer's block. You do it because you gotta! Happy writing!


Digg!


Read more!

Monday, October 20, 2008

Rejecting the Rejection Slips

You’ve received a rejection slip. Dozens, in fact. But you know your work is good. The form rejection slips, many of which contain grammatical errors, have convinced you that no one in the Big Apple is seriously considering your manuscript. The agent (or his or her apprentice) isn’t even sending you back the sample chapters—just the rejection slip. (To see the rest of this post, click on “Read More” below.)



Does this mean you should use your manuscript to line the birdcage? Au contraire. Fight! You are the first and best advocate for your writing. Revise it, if need be. Or simply rename it, write a better query letter, and send it to other agents. If you’ve been through every agency you can find or think of, then go online and look at some of the larger agencies you’ve already submitted to and submit to a different agent within that house. It’s kosher.

No acceptances yet? Then do some research and start sending your masterpiece to independent presses. They’re open to new talent, although the competition is still tough. If your story was worth the time it took to write, then it’s worth submitting to the “indies.”

Still no response that promises results? Try small presses. They may have only small print runs, anywhere from 100-1000 copies, but at least your book will have found a home. People will read it. And who knows—maybe some literary agent will read it and bring you into the major leagues. Or a Hollywood director will see it and think that it would make a damn good screenplay.

No? Then find a POD firm and put it out for less than five hundred dollars. Promote it on a website or give away copies if your have to, but don’t stop believing in your work just because it didn’t get picked up by a traditional publisher. Ultimately, nothing can stop you from getting into print. Sure, it’s great to make a gazillion dollars and make the bestseller list, but legion are the authors—Tom Clancy, John Grisham, and many others—who “went begging” before anything good happened. Clancy had to publish with the Naval Institute, and when Ronald Reagan read The Hunt for Red October . . .

Start fighting back. Stop assuming that the world of conglomerate publishing—or anyone else—understands your vision. To be a successful writer in 2008 is to be a guerilla. Go for it.


Digg!


Read more!

Sunday, October 19, 2008

Stephen King's Haven Foundation

In 1999, Stephen King was hit by a careless driver and almost killed. Because of considerable pain, he found it difficult to work after that and announced a premature retirement. Fortunately, King has resumed writing, with his latest novel, Duma Key, indicating that he has lost nothing during his brief foray into vacationland. Recognizing that (To read the rest of this post, please click on “Read Me” below.)



most writers and freelancers are not able to financially withstand such an accident, he started The Haven Foundation in 2006. The Foundation seeks to give financial aid to freelancers who are unable to work due to accident or injury. Most freelancers must pay into their own retirement accounts and hospitalization, and many do not have much in the way of a financial cushion to fall back on in case of illness. King’s foundation has helped many writers, including those in southeastern Louisiana unable to work after Katrina. To learn more about The Haven Foundation or to make a contribution, please visit The Haven Foundation

Digg!


Read more!

The Act of Writing: Believing in Yourself

The literary marketplace may look grim when it comes to first novels or unpublished authors, but if you let the publishing climate dictate your ability to get words down on a page, then the battle is already lost. (To read the rest of this post, click on “Read More” below.)



Every day on Writers Almanac on Public Radio, Garrison Keillor advises everyone to “do good work.” I may be wrong, but I don’t think he’s just speaking to published or bestselling authors, nor is he speaking to the potentates who sit in the corner offices of the publishing conglomerates. He’s speaking to people with a passion for the written word, people who have something to say. No one is disqualified from being a writer during those five minutes when his show airs.

C. S. Lewis and J. R. R. Tolkein were members of a small group of writers called The Inklings. Lewis firmly believed that having an audience of one made writing worthwhile. I’ll add to his belief that we are all our first, best critics. If we believe we have something to say, then we should write. Will other people read it? That’s not the issue when a work is being born. As Ray Bradbury said, one must write because there is an urgency to shoot a character out of a cannon or because there is something vitally important that must be said. The fat bank account comes later.

Writers are vehicles for what needs to be said, which is, granted, a rather spiritual way to look at practicing the craft, but I think it is correct. There is nothing more delightful than sitting down with a legal pad and a pencil and beginning to connect with words, ideas, vision. The end product may end up as a successful novel or poem. Or it may be read online—or even by Aunt Bertha down the street. What’s important is that the idea was born and the words took shape. They have been placed in a public forum. The idea may make someone smile or it may change someone’s life.
The axiom says, “Always consider your audience.” What I say, however, is always consider your mission. That comes first.


Digg!


Read more!

What is Magical Realism: It's Relation to Sci-fi and Fantasy

Sci-fi, fantasy, and magical realism represent genres with considerable overlap, with magical realism generally regarded as a sub-genre of fantasy, although it, too, may frequently have elements of classic science fiction. As will be seen, the latter is also sometimes regarded as literary fiction. (To read the rest of this post, click “Read More” below.)



Let’s examine these genres to see how and why there is so much overlap among all three, keeping in mind that there is some disagreement among publishers and scholars as to the definitions of magical realism. Publishers also play fast and loose with genre classifications when attempting to tap into a crossover market. All points made below, therefore, have many exceptions.

Science fiction has several distinguishing features. It most often deals with other civilizations, usually advanced cultures set in outer space or earth’s distant future (or occasionally its past). The main characters are either humanoids or members of a different species. They may have unusual powers, such as telepathy or telekinesis, but rarely can they perform magic, per se, using incantations or spells. Plots are generally plausible within their contexts of time and setting, and the narratives consist of action that the reader can imagine without too much difficulty when it comes to the all-important “willing suspension of disbelief.” There is a heavy focus on advanced technology (or its complete absence), and a work of science fiction often carries thematic warnings relative to warfare, the abuse of technology, genetics, or an over-mechanized civilization. Social orders and political institutions are naturally modified from the familiar, but again, they are generally both recognizable and plausible.

Fantasy is a genre heavily invested in magic and the supernatural, which are integral to plot, theme, or setting. It usually keeps clear of technology (unless set in a time when a technological civilization has completely crumbled), favoring rural settings and characters living in villages, clans, or kingdoms. As in science fiction, characters may represent different species, but they are more mythical in nature, such as dwarves, elves, wizards, dragons, and monsters. Fantasy often takes place in unspecified locations or times, as in Tolkien’s Middle Earth, and customs are heavily accented to reinforce tribal or cultural identity, such as those of hobbits. An entire mythological backstory is usually provided to create believability while providing context for epic struggles between good and evil. Charms, spells, and talismans are staples of fantasy fiction.

One can already see that there are many similarities between sci-fi and fantasy. The Chronicles of Narnia by C. S. Lewis and The Lord of the Rings trilogy by J. R. R. Tolkien are clearly fantasies in their use of mythical creatures and magic. Lewis’s Space Trilogy (Out of the Silent Planet, Perelandra, and That Hideous Strength) is a different matter, however. It is marketed as straightforward science fiction, and yet technology is secondary to Lewis’s emphasis on Christianity. Lewis himself said of the trilogy that, “The books are not especially concerned with scientific accuracy or technological speculation, and in many ways they read like fantasy adventures.” He also said that the interplanetary ideas in the series clearly represented mythology. Kurt Vonnegut is another example where classification becomes tricky. He began his career as a science fiction writer, authoring The Sirens of Titan. Although his plots in later years continued to use outlandish scenarios, time travel, and unusual inventions, the action in his novels took place on earth and evolved into dark satire of the human species not unlike Mark Twain’s. Today, his novels are regarded as literary fiction and are studied in lit classes around the country. Finally, some sagas, such as Star Wars, are clearly sci-fi fantasies, with all lines between the two genres blurred.

And then there is magical realism, a genre in which elements of sci-fi or fantasy (usually fantasy) are introduced into normal geographical setting, mixing characters and real-life situations (even historical) with supernatural events. Author Gabriel Garcia Marquez, author of One Hundred Years of Solitude, stated that, “My most important problem was destroying the lines of demarcation that separate what seems to be real from what seems fantastic.” More recognizable to some readers perhaps are the Harry Potter adventures, for which one could make a strong argument of magical realism as the classification. Harry comes from the very ordinary world of the twentieth century before attending the magical school of Hogwarts. By the same token, wizards (and other characters) from Hogwarts journey from their mythical realm into modern-day England, and in Book One, the reader finds Harry in certain British shops that seem to have some very magical properties as he purchases “wizard supplies.”

Another modern example of magical realism is Shoeless Joe, the novel by W. P. Kinsella upon which the film Field of Dreams is based. In this novel, Shoeless Joe Jackson, a deceased member of the disgraced 1919 Chicago White Sox (nicknamed the “Black Sox” after the team threw the World Series), finds himself in the main character’s cornfield in Iowa. How Joe and other dead ballplayers find their way into the modern world is never explained, which is a hallmark of magical realism. The events in works of magical realism are often quite inexplicable. With normal reality as the backbone of a plot, however, the reader is more inclined to suspend disbelief regarding the supernatural aspects of the story. Kinsella’s novel also makes use of time travel (actually more of a slight “reality shift”) and synchronistic signs to advance the plot. The main character (Ray Kinsella) also hears voices and has dreams that lead him to perform certain actions. With such strong historical roots, Shoeless Joe might well be considered literary fiction since, as with the novels of Vonnegut, the author’s intent is to make a larger statement. In this case, Kinsella speaks of how progress and modernization have swept away much of country’s heritage, with baseball marking time as to what is both lasting and good within the culture.

Many authors and readers now refer to books with elements of fantasy or science as metaphysical fiction. Strictly speaking, all books are metaphysical in nature since the goal of metaphysics is to understand and interpret space, time, the properties of reality, personality, and cause and effect. While some fiction might be termed New Age rather than metaphysical because it focuses sharply on themes of healing, parallel universes, or the supernatural, such books are usually subsumed under the genres described above that already deal, to a greater or lesser degree, with various aspects of quantum physics, the unexplained, or the supernatural.
As noted at the beginning of this post, there are numerous exceptions to the above points. Scholars themselves define magical realism in many ways, some of which are at odds with the use of the term by book reviewers. W.P Kinsella’s work has been uniformly described as magical realism, while scholars would be inclined so say that his works have little to do with the work and technique of Garcia Marquez.


Digg!


Read more!

Saturday, October 18, 2008

The Memoir of Buzz Aldrin

Apollo astronaut Buzz Aldrin, the second man to walk on the moon—and how many people can remember his name—is working on a memoir due out next year. Magnificent Desolation: The Long Road Home from the Moon, will be published by Harmony Books, with the scheduled launch date (sorry about the pun) to coincide with the fortieth anniversary of Apollo 11’s moon landing. (To see the rest of this post, click on "Read More" below.)



Being number two is tough. Reaching the moon was an unparalleled achievement in American history, but to train rigorously for such a mission, only to be forgotten by many because he was second down the ladder of the Eagle, took its toll on Aldrin, who suffered from alcoholism and depression in the years that followed. At thirty-nine years of age, he didn’t know where to go with his life after walking on the lunar surface. How does one even begin to follow that kind of act?

I watched each and every space launch when growing up, from the Mercury flight of Alan Shepherd to the final Apollo mission to the moon. I’ll scoop up Aldrin’s hardcover the day it’s released. Meanwhile, I recommend that anyone interested in the space program visit Buzz Aldrin’s Official Website.



Digg!


Read more!

Fewer Debut Titles Predicted: Midlist Authors Dwindling

Industry sources representing many publishers, editors, and literary agencies now report that even fewer books will be reaching the public in the near future. This will occur in an already downsized literary marketplace. Debut fiction and nonfiction from new authors will have more and more trouble finding a home. This means that new authors who would normally be considered “midlist projects” will find getting a contract—or even literary representation—even harder than before. (To read the rest of this post, click on "Read More" below.)



Super-agent Richard Abate with the Endeavor Talent Agency believes that publishers are trending toward acquiring books by celebrities, books that will command six-figure advances as opposed to the midlist advance of approximately $50,000, give or take. Athletes, movie stars, and just about anyone who is mega-famous will get the ear of agents, such as Tina Fey, who is reputed to have signed a book deal for $6,000,000.

The trend is an extension of the downsizing of the industry, which began as more and more conglomerates acquired old and venerable publishing houses that had independent standards, some for over a hundred years. People have heard names such as Random House, Doubleday, HarperCollins, and Scribners, but few realize that virtually all major imprints are now owned by companies such as Bertelsmann, Holtzbrinck, Pearson, Time Warner, Viacom, and others.

This is not good news for the first-time author, the person with a passion to write—and superior talent. More and more people are turning to independent and small presses, as well as Print-on-Demand. POD is becoming exceedingly popular, although few authors know how to promote such books, which are over-priced to begin with by companies such as iUniverse. Those who make POD titles profitable usually have a marketing platform, such as motivational speakers or businessmen. Currently, Dan Poynter, author of The Self-Publishing Manual and owner of Para Publishing, is considered the high guru for those who have the time, money, and inclination to learn how to promote their own books. It’s a tough row to hoe, but it’s possible.

Th trend to publish fewer books is nothing less than Orwellian in nature. As technology explodes across the globe and the worldwide web puts people into greater and greater cyber-proximity, it’s crucial that ideas continue to find their way to the literary marketplace. In a future post, I’ll have something to say about what I call Literary Chaos Theory, for in the long run, ideas can’t be suppressed. In the meantime, aspiring authors need to do their homework and target prospective agents with precision, offering them great work, with break-out potential if posssible.


Digg!


Read more!

Sarah Palin: Barracuda with a Book Deal

One is never supposed to talk about religion or politics at a cocktail party, family gathering—or anywhere, for that matter. But political correctness must be reined in sooner or later, allowing the chips to fall where they may. Case in point: Gibson Square launced the biography of Sarah Palin, authored by Kaylene Johnson, on October 7, 2008. (To read the rest of this post, click on "Read More" below.)



Considering that Palin has been on the GOP ticket less than two months, that’s not much time to assemble a credible book. There is no indication that Palin was considering a biography before becoming McCain’s running mate, so this bit of political expediency, coupled with the launch date, makes one wonder how much accuracy and thought the book contains on Ms. Palin. I respect politicians, regardless of party affiliation or political ambition, who have a grasp of language—and the time—to write their own books or memoirs. This kind of biography is nothing more than the equivalent of pre-fab tract housing. It’s a house and it’s “there.” Publisher Martin Rynja freely confessed to a short turnaround time for this book, and it’s no secret that books are released to coincide with current events. But this fact begs the question. Can Ms. Palin’s biography be considered as anything but a campaign tool? Hardly. As such, can it even be considered legitimate biography at all? Does speed of light collation of superficial facts for political gain constitute a thoughtful biography? This release reminds me a great deal of the week John Lennon was assassinated. Within seven days, a “biography” of Lennon’s life was released. And yep, it surely corresponded time-wise with his death. Talk about your short turnaround time! It was also a worthless and distasteful piece of garbage. Gibson Square has announced that Palin’s book will have many interviews with friends and family. All I can say is, “You betchal.”


Digg!


Read more!

Friday, October 10, 2008

The Usefulness of Writing Groups

Should one join a writing group to hone one’s skills? It depends on the writing group. Having taught writing for over twenty-years before becoming a full-time ghostwriter, novelist, and poet, I myself led several groups, and I hated each and every one. Such writing classes usually end up breaking into—and I cringe—small work groups for peer editing and critique. (To read the rest of this post, click on "Read More" below.)



A majority of times, however, the skill levels of people within a group are grossly unequal. The worst-case scenario is that no one in the group has a sense of plotting, pace, or style, and the result is a classic case of the blind leading the blind. A secondary result is that much good writing gets slammed, and much poor writing is praised. It’s mandatory, therefore, that a qualified teacher screen prospective students (usually at community colleges or free university classes) and request writing samples before admission to the class. Second, the teacher needs to be especially careful of peer-editing and review, establishing firm guidelines to make sure that critiques will be helpful. But can anyone teach another to write to begin with? Not really. People are born with a facility of language, which can be nurtured to a greater or lesser degree. I’m not saying that joining a writing group is useless or counterproductive, but I think the best way to hone one’s craft is to read a lot and write a lot. Period. Stephen King has said it, and so has Ray Bradbury, to mention just two writers who know how to downshift a verb and bevel a series of adjectives. If the talent is there, the self-critique will follow. The bottom line is that if someone is going to be a writer—a good writer—he or she must be able to look at a piece of writing when no one else is around and say, “I nailed it.”


Digg!


Read more!